Environmental Monitoring and Assessment †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Answer: Introduction British American Tobacco came into existence over 100 years ago. BAT world famous tobacco brand is growing year to year in the global world. It is meeting the needs of a customer and fulfilling the commitments of meeting different preference of customers. BAT is innovating to fulfill new demands of customers for potentially less risky cigarettes and tobacco. Their vision is to gain leadership in global tobacco industry by adopting strategies focusing on growth, improved productivity, development and much more. BAT created together with assistance of partners in discourse, it comprises of Business Principles: Mutual Benefit, Responsible Product Stewardship and Good Corporate Conduct, and eighteen Core Beliefs. All Group organizations have embraced the Statement and urged to take part in partner exchange to help deciding the ways of best practices which can be adopted in their business. Their Business Principles and Core Beliefs become the reason continuous checking of Group organizations' CSR execution. Tobacco is generally grown as a mono-crop, affecting the other tobacco plants and soil vulnerable against an assortment of bugs and infections. This implies tobacco plants needs expansive amounts of chemicals (bug sprays, herbicides, fungicides and fumigants) and development controllers (development inhibitors and maturing operators) to control irritation (Zoffoli, et al., 2013). A company like BAT is using huge chemicals affecting soil and farmers. Huge numbers of these preservative are unsafe to both the earth and agriculturists. In spite of this they are prohibited only in few nations. In weak and centre wage nations, pesticide and development sprayers are typically connected with knapsack sprayers without the utilization of the important defensive gear, creating skin and breathing problem (Sanchez?Bayo Hyne, 2011). Tobacco plants needs exhaustive utilization of manures as they retain more nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in comparison to other real nourishment and money crops, which means tobacco exhausts soil ripeness quickly. Moreover BAT agricultural practices intended to accomplish high yield by using nicotine levels (counting "topping", in the best piece for product evacuation to counteract seeds shaping and growing onto the dirt, and "de-suckering", where parallel buds are expelled) additionally help exhaust the dirt. Environmental change, longest haul move in the worlds for climatic changes and abnormal temperatures, is the aftereffect of expanded ozone depleting substance emanations, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide (Gordon, Carrigan Hastings, 2011). These discharges have been expanding from the pre-modern period caused by companies like BAT and are caused fundamentally due to monetary action and population increase. All procedure for cigarette creation, starting from leaf development to cigarette transportation, adds to ozone harming substance emission. In present, pressing requirement for far reaching assessments of carbon is delivered through the tobacco life-cycle. Impact of tobacco on the forest is huge since the 1970s. It is the important cause of concern and evidence of sufficient irreversible loss of trees and other species. BAT practices for its farming are concern for environmental change. Tobacco farming is becoming a threat to biodiversity (Agrawal, Nepstad Chhatre, 2011). BAT practices are also a factor in causing deforestation. Many countries faced fuel wood shortages which increased deforestation. In mid-90s, more than half countries growing tobacco faced loss of 211000 hectares of cultivated land. BAT effect on deforestation need evaluation and need prevails for autonomous observing of the size of tobacco-related deforestation, viability of reaction to the issue, and the tobacco business procedures to impact open approach on nature (Lindenmayer, et ol., 2012). Cutting trees harms the environment most, as trees stops harmful sunrays to reach earth during day time and holding heat in night. This leads to extreme swings in environment temperature which is harmful for everyone. Farmers' livelihoods and health: Tobacco farmers generally have low income and are prone to health issues, as the expenditure on raw materials and land used is high. Moreover no regular and sustainable food supply available for them. BAT is also creating difficulty for farmers as increase in tobacco farming is creating health issues and livelihood problem in rural area. Food insecurity and health of farmers are the main worry for tobacco growing countries (Hunt, 2011). They also face an economic issue, as the living conditions of non-tobacco farmers are much better than farmers doing tobacco farming. Public concern about genetically modified horticulture has driven tobacco organizations to adopt a wary strategy to its utilization, or if nothing else to publicizing any inclusion in related research. The emission of colorless high toxic gases by BAT is intensively harming farmers' health as they are very prone to climatic diseases. Exposure to high level of toxins in company itself is also creating many diseases for e mployees of BAT like pulmonary edema, hydrogen sulfide and much more. Historically, the tobacco business has left impressive exertion into adjusting the characteristics of tobacco leaf through hereditary control; however tobacco organizations like BAT have hoped to utilize hereditary building to control nicotine focus. Diminishing nicotine is a piece of more extensive endeavors to create conceivably less harmful cigarettes that incorporate mapping of the tobacco genome and has subsidizing research into hereditarily altered tobacco leaf that produces fewer carcinogens (Floss, et al., 2010). Research has additionally been attempted into the likelihood of raising nicotine levels, with the expectation of expanding addictiveness, the best-known illustration might be BAT's 'super-tobacco', a hereditarily designed plant variation that contained a considerably higher than common measure of nicotine and was planned to make the organization's items more addictive. Radioactive material used by BAT for production in tobacco leaves harms the fertilizers of soil. There is continued critical reluctance with respect to the business to give information in ways that would help calculate its actual natural effect. As a rule, international tobacco organizations report fundamental information for example, yearly CO2 equal outflows, water utilize, squander water emanating, tonnage of strong waste to landfill, level of waste reused, and tonnage of dangerous waste. The harm created by BAT tobacco leftovers are more critical for environment, as tobacco does not burn completely. The substances left in environment during production process are lead, ammonia, Benzene and many more. These factors cause cancer and other major health problem. BAT is creating severe harm during production process and affecting the environmental process. Manipulated CSR: To keep away from the liability of corporate obligation, transnational tobacco organizations' assembling exercises have frequently moved far from nations with solid ecological controls to contaminate nations with less stringent natural principles. Here they likewise seek after other financial motivators, for example, low fare duties. In March 2016, British American Tobacco (BAT) declared they are closing down the Malaysian cigarette fabricating plant in light of increased taxes (110% more than 5 years) and Malaysia's discussion on presenting plain packaging but in actuality BAT had officially made arrangements for another assembling unit in Vietnam, a long time before either exchanges on plain bundling or the excise taxes. Agrochemical use: Most agrochemicals have an adverse effect on the organisation, as the use of these chemicals affects health of the worker. As BAT is tobacco Company, so the health of workers in the organisation is at risk. Those which are used rarely also effects, as small quantity of dangerous chemicals also impairs the health of the worker. Contamination of the lips and mouth or unplanned gulping of agrochemicals is regularly caused by poor cleanliness or awful practice. Inability to wash legitimately some time recently eating is a typical reason, as is smoking amid work. Endeavouring to clean a blocked sprayer spout by putting it between the lips and blowing through it is another awful practice. Thus, the health of workers working at BAT is at risk (Dunlap McCright, 2011). And also risk is transferred to the environment by the pollutants of tobacco farming which indirectly again effect the organization and in future degraded health and environment won't provide growth to BAT. Climate change affects companies: The changes in climate have directly effects on the economy, society, and other factors in a significant manner. Under economy effects pollution emission by companies is considered important, as the pollution caused by tobacco industry to environment is substantially high (Kjellstrom Crowe, 2011). These would affect companies only in long term due to lesser chances of high profitability in future. And society is also harmed by climatic changes affecting companies, as that does not produce pollution also is affected by climate change in environment. Main reason for this will be change in demand and supply pattern of customers demand, change in pricing of goods, increase in transportation cost and unusual electricity rates. As unpredictable climate leads to demand and supply of non-climatic products demand by customers which will affect company profitability and existence. Deforestation: Deforestation causes global warming, which brings about many unfavourable circumstances, including drought. A Higher level of deforestation causes increased water level consumption for other livestock and crops. So it will affect future of the organization in a negative way as lesser water availability for tobacco industry will lead to decrease in business (Villoria, Byerlee Stevenson, 2014). Hence misbalancing the cycle of tobacco and affecting revenue generation power of BAT. The profit earned from deforestation is only short term, as in future on the availability of resources will hinder the business as well as nation's growth. Cutting a large number of trees also lead to global warming, this affects the business opportunities only. The greater parts of the countries that have experienced deforestation are really inadmissible for long-term agriculture utilize, for example, farming and cultivating. When denied of their timberland cover, the grounds quickly debase in quality, losing their fruitfulness and arability (Mueller, et al., 2013). The soil in many deforested ranges is additionally unsatisfactory for supporting yearly products. Thus it will harm the business in future of tobacco companies like BAT. As losing fertility by soil will harm tobacco growing process and due to non-availability of raw materials will also harm BAT growth. Farmer's health: A sick workforce will probably be bringing the loss in productivity to an organization adding to the many difficulties farmers need to deal with including drought cultivate assaults and issues of land ownership. Diabetes and cardiovascular infections are normal among cultivate laborers. With regards to dangers affecting the workforce, there are a bunch of elements impacting agriculture operations' productivity in their commitment to nourishment generation (Polosa, et al., 2013). The negative impact of stress mental trauma substance abuse money related stresses and specialists living with interminable sicknesses were probably going to exacerbate cultivate laborers' condition of wellbeing. All the factors discussed directly hinder the BAT growth, as workers with ill health will not be able to give result required by BAT to prosper in future. Moreover more sick laborers in an organization impair the goodwill in the market. Hence having a fewer number of employees availa ble in future with BAT. Harm during production: Tobacco is not very resilient versatile yield. It's amazingly vulnerable against illnesses and vermin, which is the reason it transformative created nicotine as a characteristic pesticide (Peattie, 2001). BAT tobacco industry is harming nature in various ways like CO2 emissions, harming biodiversity, impact on digging plants, depletion in resources and much more. Interestingly enough, nicotine is utilized as both a pesticide and an herbicide up to this point when it was supplanted with more viable concoction mixes. These pesticides contaminate water and soil and there are up to 5 million instances of pesticide harming revealed worldwide consistently. BAT is creating a negative effect on communities living nearby tobacco industry. Increase in an emission of CO2 is adversely harming nature cycle (Mitchell, 2010). Waste management is also getting effected as recycling is not available with many of the pollutants and waste. Sustainability approaches by BAT: Sustainable agriculture: BAT experts contract with farmers to grow the crop in right way. BAT advises on water management, biodiversity, use of agro chemicals and pest management (Wezel, 2014). BAT also supplies seeds to the farmer that are less harmful to nature. Bat is also providing ways to access sustainable farming technologies like fuel efficient curing barns and advise on growing other crops as well. Alternative crops: An initiative taken by the government for finding an alternative of tobacco farming. BAT promotes appropriate economically sustainable alternatives of tobacco growing. As alternative crops minimise the effect on the environment caused by tobacco and also acts as a sustainable approach by BAT towards the environment. Increasing export of tobacco crop is not an ethical option for any country (Tilman, 2011). So BAT should ensure economically viability alternatives for employees and farmers. The company also supports the initiative taken by FCTC group in developing guidelines for finding alternatives in tobacco growing. Afforestation: BAT afforestation initiatives encourage tree planting for making a sustainable source for woods for farming. This would act as an approach toward wood used for tobacco curing. They are also aiming at the negligible use of natural forests for curing and directly contracting with farmers (Otaez Glantz, 2011). In 2012 there was progress in this target was achieved by 3%. And also 140 million trees were planted to absorb carbon dioxide emissions. The co emissions were half of annual CO emissions by leaf curing by farmers. Moreover, potential of all trees planted was considerably greater. Biodiversity: BAT biodiversity risk and opportunities evaluation tools help the company to protect and increase biodiversity around tobacco plantation areas. All their tobacco plants assessment were sufficient to combat the harm and started focusing on leaf growing operations. Health and safety: BAT fleet and safety programs focused on risk occurring through globally enhanced vehicle safety control. They also provided proper learning to drivers to enhance their skills and hazard perception, a framework for management, toolkits for employees, security measures in high-risk areas, the significant route to market planning. BAT achieved 14% decrease in accidents in TMD area (McDaniel Malone, 2012). Climate change legislation: They contracted with Paris on climate change and its effect on their operations. Over presence in 200 markets, they have the opportunity to contribute the considerable amount of contribution to combat climate change and its harmful effects. In 2016 they also developed new targets to be achieved in upcoming years. They also decided to reduce CO2 emissions by 2050 to 20%. They also switched to energy efficient technologies, using less fuel consuming machinery, adopting more renewable resources and increasing environmental friendly seeds. BAT is consuming considerable very less amount of water in harvesting its tobacco crop, as scarcity of water prevalent in the world. They also have evaluated water risk at their all strategic high-risk sites. Youth smoking prevention: Notwithstanding BAT strict necessity to just market tobacco items to grown-up smokers, expecting youth smoking prevention exercises to be done in every business sectors where straightforwardly conveying items and where these exercises are allowed by nearby enactment. In 2016, they accomplished this in every one of these sorts of business sectors (Lee, Ling Glantz, 2012). Their exercises incorporate working with retailers to counteract underage access, for example, through supporting confirmation of-age conspires, and giving preparing and mindfulness rising to shop staff. We likewise draw in with governments to build up a base age law of 18 or to authorize harder punishments for those that break existing age - 18 laws. External recognition and regulation: BAT got recognized as adopting sustainable approaches as continuous inclusion in Dow Jones Sustainability indices for 15 years. Their focus on sustainability and reporting gained high profile recognition. Their experience allows them to offer significant practices towards developing policies around tobacco to the government (British American tobacco, n.d.). They have dependably been certain that we support the direction that depends on considerable proof and exhaustive research regards legitimate rights and employments and conveys the proposed approach points while perceiving unintended results. They need to add to the open deliberation, offering data, thoughts and pragmatic strides to enable controllers to address the key issues confronting the business. That is the reason on issues, for example, the control of Next Generation Products, we have been working with governments and controllers to guarantee suitable systems are set up to secure shoppers while guaranteeing appropriate advertising opportunities exists. This will enable to develop the class and take care of the demand for less dangerous other options to smoking. Plain packaging: As there is no supporting evidence that plain packaging reduces smoking practices amongst youths. BAT considers plain packing as illegal as it involves the government taking property from them and in this case allowing the use of trademarks and intellectual property (Moodie, et al., 2011). A proper market for consumer goods involves clearly differentiated brand and quality with price determination. In 2015 BAT launched a legal challenge against the UK to implement plain packaging and result for this was BAT was granted acceptance to claim against the decision to the court of appeal. Their reason for this opposition was plain packaging is not effective in decreasing smoking levels. E-cigarette regulation: The use of vapor products manufactured to increase quality and safety hazards is considerably less risky than using conventional smoking. BAT believes in adopting e-cigarettes in a unique way (Zhu, et al., 2014). The country should promote the growing trend of consuming nicotine products like vapor products. As these have higher chances of improving public health and has the ability to cut down the smoking habits amongst people. Their increasing weight on supporting tobacco harm reduction by different media is also helping them to make future decision making. Ingredients banning: BAT prohibits the use of ingredients which have sound scientific proof to increase toxicological harm of product. Also supports an increase in pharmacological effects due to nicotine and lead as the increase in youth smoking (Deyton, Sharfstein Hamburg, 2010). All tobacco products that BAT uses does not contain significant health risk and nor do they prompt people to start consuming tobacco. Conclusion Sustainability should be seen over space and time with a specific end goal to incorporate the aberrant impacts and outcomes of various approaches that may effect in different areas and who and what is to come. The undertaking of economical utilization of modest assets is troublesome in correlations with that of the endless assets, yet it is not troublesome. To save them for the future utilize companies should utilize, spare and moderate them efficiently. It ought to likewise be organization primary obligation to endeavor to discover ways and intends to substitute them by copious assets particularly the endless assets. As per the above case, BAT is putting enough effort to maintain sustainability. Its practices are an environmental friendly in comparison to others. BAT practices like e-cigarettes, youth smoking prevention and much more are helping them to attain good sustainability in the market. References Agrawal, A., Nepstad, D. and Chhatre, A., 2011. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, pp.373-396. British American tobacco, n.d., A sustainable approach, viewed on 27th august 2017, Available at https://www.bat.com/group/sites/UK__9D9KCY.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO9DCFJG. Deyton, L., Sharfstein, J. and Hamburg, M., 2010. Tobacco product regulationa public health approach. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(19), pp.1753-1756. Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M., 2011. Organized climate change denial. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, pp.144-160. Floss, D.M., Schallau, K., Rose-John, S., Conrad, U. and Scheller, J., 2010. Elastin-like polypeptides revolutionize recombinant protein expression and their biomedical application. Trends in biotechnology, 28(1), pp.37-45. Gordon, R., Carrigan, M. and Hastings, G., 2011. A framework for sustainable marketing. Marketing Theory, 11(2), pp.143-163. Hunt, S.D., 2011. Sustainable marketing, equity, and economic growth: a resource-advantage, economic freedom approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), pp.7-20. Kjellstrom, T. and Crowe, J., 2011. Climate change, workplace heat exposure, and occupational health and productivity in Central America. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 17(3), pp.270-281. Lee, S., Ling, P.M. and Glantz, S.A., 2012. The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries. Cancer Causes Control, 23(1), pp.117-129. Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., Lhmus, A., Baker, S.C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W., Brodie, A., Kiehl, B., Kouki, J., Pastur, G.M. and Messier, C., 2012. A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues. Conservation Letters, 5(6), pp.421-431. McDaniel, P.A. and Malone, R.E., 2012. British American Tobacco's partnership with Earthwatch Europe and its implications for public health. Global public health, 7(1), pp.14-28. Mitchell, R.W., Wooliscroft, B. and Higham, J., 2010. Sustainable market orientation: A new approach to managing marketing strategy. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), pp.160-170. Moodie, C., Mackintosh, A.M., Hastings, G. and Ford, A., 2011. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tobacco Control, 20(5), pp.367-373. Mueller, R., Pistorius, T., Rohde, S., Gerold, G. and Pacheco, P., 2013. Policy options to reduce deforestation based on a systematic analysis of drivers and agents in lowland Bolivia. Land Use Policy, 30(1), pp.895-907. Otaez, M. and Glantz, S.A., 2011. Social responsibility in tobacco production? Tobacco companies' use of green supply chains to obscure the real costs of tobacco farming. Tobacco control, pp.tc-2010. Peattie, K., 2001. Towards sustainability: The third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), pp.129-146. Polosa, R., Rodu, B., Caponnetto, P., Maglia, M. and Raciti, C., 2013. A fresh look at tobacco harm reduction: the case for the electronic cigarette. Harm reduction journal, 10(1), p.19. Sanchez?Bayo, F. and Hyne, R.V., 2011. Comparison of environmental risks of pesticides between tropical and nontropical regions. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 7(4), pp.577-586. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. and Befort, B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), pp.20260-20264. Villoria, N.B., Byerlee, D. and Stevenson, J., 2014. The effects of agricultural technological progress on deforestation: what do we really know?. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 36(2), pp.211-237. Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.F., Ferrer, A. and Peign, J., 2014. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34(1), pp.1-20. Zhu, S.H., Sun, J.Y., Bonnevie, E., Cummins, S.E., Gamst, A., Yin, L. and Lee, M., 2014. Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tobacco control, 23(suppl 3), pp.iii3-iii9. Zoffoli, H.J.O., Amaral-Sobrinho, N.M.B., Zonta, E., Luisi, M.V., Marcon, G. and Toln-Becerra, A., 2013. Inputs of heavy metals due to agrochemical use in tobacco fields in Brazil's Southern Region. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 185(3), pp.2423-2437.